Skip to content Skip to footer

Cyber Crime Conventions

The following international conventions and protocols are relevant in the field of cyber crime:


  • Budapest Convention on Cybercrime (2001) – first international agreement which aims to reduce computer-related crime by serving as a guideline for any country wanting to develop national laws against cybercrime and aims at increasing international cooperation.
  • Protocol on Xenophobia and Racism committed through computer systems. (2003) – follows the Convention.
  • Convention on the Protection of Children against Sexual Exploitation and Sexual Abuse (2007) – Contains relevant provisions restricting the use of computer technology to access child pornography (Article 21(1)(f)), to distribute child pornography (Article 30(5)) or to solicit children for sexual purposes (Article 23).

The following table provides for the countries who have signed and ratified the Budapest Convention:

Chart of signatures and ratifications of Treaty 185

Convention on Cybercrime

Status as of 13/03/2020

Title Convention on Cybercrime
Reference ETS No.185
Opening of the treaty Budapest, 23/11/2001  – Treaty open for signature by the member States and the non-member

States which have participated in its elaboration and for accession by other non-member States

Entry into Force 01/07/2004  – 5 Ratifications including at least 3 member States of the Council of Europe

State who signed State who ratified State who neither signed nor ratified State who suspended State who denounced

Members of Council of Europe
  Signature Ratification Entry into Force Notes R. D. A. T. C. O.
Albania 23/11/2001 20/06/2002 01/07/2004 A.
Andorra 23/04/2013 16/11/2016 01/03/2017 R. D. A.
Armenia 23/11/2001 12/10/2006 01/02/2007 A.
Austria 23/11/2001 13/06/2012 01/10/2012 R. D. A.
Azerbaijan 30/06/2008 15/03/2010 01/07/2010 R. D. A. T.
Belgium 23/11/2001 20/08/2012 01/12/2012 R. D. A.
Bosnia and Herzegovina 09/02/2005 19/05/2006 01/09/2006 A.
Bulgaria 23/11/2001 07/04/2005 01/08/2005 R. D. A.
Croatia 23/11/2001 17/10/2002 01/07/2004 A.
Cyprus 23/11/2001 19/01/2005 01/05/2005 A.
Czech Republic 09/02/2005 22/08/2013 01/12/2013 R. D. A.
Denmark 22/04/2003 21/06/2005 01/10/2005 R. A. T.
Estonia 23/11/2001 12/05/2003 01/07/2004 A.
Finland 23/11/2001 24/05/2007 01/09/2007 R. D. A.
France 23/11/2001 10/01/2006 01/05/2006 R. D. A.
Georgia 01/04/2008 06/06/2012 01/10/2012 D.
Germany 23/11/2001 09/03/2009 01/07/2009 R. D. A.
Greece 23/11/2001 25/01/2017 01/05/2017 R. D. A.
Hungary 23/11/2001 04/12/2003 01/07/2004 R. D. A.
Iceland 30/11/2001 29/01/2007 01/05/2007 R. A.
Ireland 28/02/2002
Italy 23/11/2001 05/06/2008 01/10/2008 A.
Latvia 05/05/2004 14/02/2007 01/06/2007 R. A.
Liechtenstein 17/11/2008 27/01/2016 01/05/2016 R. D. A.
Lithuania 23/06/2003 18/03/2004 01/07/2004 R. D. A.
Luxembourg 28/01/2003 16/10/2014 01/02/2015 A.
Malta 17/01/2002 12/04/2012 01/08/2012 D.
Monaco 02/05/2013 17/03/2017 01/07/2017 A.
Montenegro 07/04/2005 03/03/2010 01/07/2010 55 R. A.
Netherlands 23/11/2001 16/11/2006 01/03/2007 A. T.
North Macedonia 23/11/2001 15/09/2004 01/01/2005 A.
Norway 23/11/2001 30/06/2006 01/10/2006 R. D. A.
Poland 23/11/2001 20/02/2015 01/06/2015 R. A.
Portugal 23/11/2001 24/03/2010 01/07/2010 D. A.
Republic of Moldova 23/11/2001 12/05/2009 01/09/2009 D. A. T.
Romania 23/11/2001 12/05/2004 01/09/2004 A.
Russian Federation
San Marino 17/03/2017 08/03/2019 01/07/2019 A.
Serbia 07/04/2005 14/04/2009 01/08/2009 55 A.
Slovak Republic 04/02/2005 08/01/2008 01/05/2008 R. D. A.
Slovenia 24/07/2002 08/09/2004 01/01/2005 A.
Spain 23/11/2001 03/06/2010 01/10/2010 D. A.
Sweden 23/11/2001
Switzerland 23/11/2001 21/09/2011 01/01/2012 R. D. A.
Turkey 10/11/2010 29/09/2014 01/01/2015
Ukraine 23/11/2001 10/03/2006 01/07/2006 R. D. A.
United Kingdom 23/11/2001 25/05/2011 01/09/2011 R. A.
Non-Members of Council of Europe
  Signature Ratification Entry into Force Notes R. D. A. T. C. O.
Argentina 05/06/2018 a 01/10/2018 R. A.
Australia 30/11/2012 a 01/03/2013 R. A.
Benin 4
Brazil 4
Burkina Faso 4
Cabo Verde 19/06/2018 a 01/10/2018 A.
Canada 23/11/2001 08/07/2015 01/11/2015 R. D. A.
Chile 20/04/2017 a 01/08/2017 R. D. A.
Colombia 4
Costa Rica 22/09/2017 a 01/01/2018 D. A.
Dominican Republic 07/02/2013 a 01/06/2013 D. A.
Ghana 03/12/2018 a 01/04/2019 A.
Israel 09/05/2016 a 01/09/2016 R. A.
Japan 23/11/2001 03/07/2012 01/11/2012 R. D. A.
Mauritius 15/11/2013 a 01/03/2014 A.
Morocco 29/06/2018 a 01/10/2018 A.
Nigeria 4
Panama 05/03/2014 a 01/07/2014 A.
Paraguay 30/07/2018 a 01/11/2018 A.
Peru 26/08/2019 a 01/12/2019 R. D. A.
Philippines 28/03/2018 a 01/07/2018 A.
Senegal 16/12/2016 a 01/04/2017 A.
South Africa 23/11/2001
Sri Lanka 29/05/2015 a 01/09/2015 R. A.
Tonga 09/05/2017 a 01/09/2017 A.
Tunisia 4
United States of America 23/11/2001 29/09/2006 01/01/2007 R. D. A.
Total number of signatures not followed by ratifications 3
Total number of ratifications/accessions 64


  • (55) Date of signature by the state union of Serbia and Montenegro.
  • (4) Since 2013 the decision to invite a non-member State to accede to the treaty is valid five years as from its adoption. See the following Chart.

Key – a: Accession s: Signature without reservation as to ratification su: Succession r: Signature “ad referendum”.
R.: Reservations D.: Declarations, Denunciations, Derogations A.: Authorities T.: Territorial Application C.: Communication O.: Objection.

Source : Treaty Office on – * Disclaimer.


  • United Nations Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime (2000)e. Palermo Convention – Creates obligations on state parties to enact domestic criminal offenses which target organized criminal groups and to adopt new frameworks for extradition, mutual legal assistance, and law enforcement cooperation. Although the treaty does not explicitly address cybercrime, its provisions are highly relevant.
  • Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989) – Article 34 of the Convention provides that the state parties should protect children from all forms of sexual exploitation and abuse, including prostitution and pornography.
  • Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child (2001) – This protocol follows the CRC Convention and addresses the sale of children, child prostitution, and child pornography. Article 3(1)(c) prohibits the production, distribution, dissemination, sale, and possession of child pornography.  The Preamble mentions the Internet as a means of distribution of child pornography.  The definition of child pornography, set forth in Article 2(3), is broad enough to encompass virtual images of children.

Additional Initiatives of UN

  • Member States called for an Un Convention on Cybercrime in the 11th Crime Congress (Bangkok 2005) but it was decided to not initiate this process.
  • It was in the 12th Crime Congress (Salvador 2010) that Member States took a decision to undertake a comprehensive study of the problem of cybercrime along with responses to it.
  • In 2010, Commission on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice (CCPCJ) requested to conduct a comprehensive study of the problem of cybercrime along with responses to it. The General Assembly (GA) adopted a resolution (A/RES/65/230) on recommendation of Economic and Social Council (EcoSoc), where it requested the CCPCJ to establish an open-ended intergovernmental expert group to conduct such a study.
    • 1st session of the group – Vienna from 17 to 21 January 2011 – it reviewed and agreed on a collection of topics as well as adopted a methodology for the study.
    • 2nd session – 25 to 28 February 2013 – The group took note of the study which was prepared by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC)
    • 3rd session – Vienna from 10-13 April 2017

Global Programme on Cybercrime

According to General Assembly resolution 65/230 and Commission on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice resolutions 22/7 and 22/8, the Global Programme on Cybercrime is mandated to assist Member States in their struggle against cyber-related crimes through capacity building and technical assistance. This programme follows the , UNODC’s open-ended intergovernmental expert group whose work was to exchange information on national legislation, best practice, technical assistance and international cooperation.

The Global Programme on Cybercrime is funded entirely through the kind support of the Governments of Australia, Canada, Japan, Norway, UK and USA.

  • Objectives & Geographic scope

The Global Programme is designed to answer to the recognized needs in developing countries by supporting the Member States to help prevent and combat cybercrime in a holistic manner. The main geographic areas that this Cybercrime Programme in 2017 caters to are Central America, Eastern Africa, MENA and South East Asia & the Pacific with key objectives of:

  • Increasing efficiency and effectiveness for the investigation, prosecution and adjudication of cybercrime, especially with reference to online child sexual exploitation and abuse, within a strong human-rights framework;
  • Efficient and effective long-term governmental response to cybercrime, including national coordination, data collection and effective legal frameworks, which will lead to a sustainable response and greater deterrence;
  • Strengthening national and international communication between governments, law enforcement and the private sector along with increasing public knowledge of cybercrime risks.

The African Union also has a convention on Cyber Security and Personal Data Protection.


In December 2019, the UN passed a Russian-led resolution on Cybercrime known as ‘Countering the use of information and communications technologies for criminal purposes’.

This draft was introduced in the 44th meeting on 7th November, 2019. A revised draft of this resolution was placed before the Committee on 18th November, 2019 (50th meeting) by the sponsors of the draft resolution along with other Member States (including India). The Committee adopted the resolution at this meeting aby a vote of 88 to 58, with 34 abstentions. (India was in favour).

The committee will review this resolution in August 2020 in order to proceed forward for passing a new convention on cybercrime. However, according to various articles, there are some serious concerns with this draft resolution including Human Right concerns. Some concerns are that the term Information and computer technologies is very vague and will be in favour of authoritative governments. In addition, the concerns regarding Budapest Convention should be focused on rather than passing a new treaty and stalling the progress of the already existing Convention.

Links to the articles:

There has also been a letter addressed to the UN General Assembly by various Ngo’s expressing their concerns over the same.

Link to the article:

Subscribe to the updates!

[mc4wp_form id="461" element_id="style-11"]